Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:08

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Gold-eating fungus could help find metals on Earth and asteroids - Earth.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Rock Icon, 78, Hauled Off Stage in Jaw-Dropping Concert Farewell - Yahoo
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Was Adam white or black (African)?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
3 Black Holes Caught Eating Massive Stars in NASA Data - NASA Science (.gov)
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How has Donald Trump turned the Taylor Swift endorsement into a win for him?
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Consequuntur dolor explicabo ipsa autem vel eos et.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?